Showing posts with label romance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romance. Show all posts

22.10.12

The Great Gatsby, Possibly My Next Favourite Movie


I just watched The Great Gatsby trailer and I am in love. I know, the trailer came out five months ago but I refused to watch it. Allow me to explain.

Every time a movie comes out that I want to see but it's based on a book, I feel that I have to read the book first. Most of the time, this doesn't work out. Water for Elephants looked amazing; it seemed like a magical, heart-wrenching story with a gorgeous circus for its setting, not to mention, I love elephants. So, I bought the book, but I didn't read it. I didn't see the movie in theatres because I was so determined to read the book first. After a while, the movie came out on DVD and I gave up. I watched it. It was good, but not amazing. A year later, I read the book. Now, that was amazing. Sometimes, it's the other way around. Although I didn't badly want to see Savages, I had the book, so I read it. It was terrible. It was a painful read, so much that I didn't really care to live through it again if the movie might be so terrible. So, I didn't see the movie. Both of these scenarios had played out a gazillion times.


I heard they were making a Great Gatsby movie. The book had been on my "to read" list for too long. I didn't really know much about it except that a lot of people loved it. I told myself that I would read the book before the trailer came out. I didn't. But I refused to watch the trailer. I didn't want the images of the actors to alter my perceptions of the characters in the book. Luckily, the movie got pushed to a later date and I wasn't bombarded with trailers on TV, so it was easy to avoid.

I finished reading The Great Gatsby last night. It was alright. I'm not a fan of the writing style but the story is just poetry. What the story needs is a new visualization, something dramatic and pulsing, glamourous and decadent. It needs someone who isn't afraid to be bold, who paints his scenes with glitz, who will give a love story the power it needs to crush you in the end.  Moulin Rouge! is my favourite movie because it is all these things, as well as a beautifully poetic story. What this book needs is exactly Baz Luhrmann and absolutely no one else. Luhrmann and The Great Gatsby is purely magic-in-the-making and it better break my heart.

22.2.12

The Vow



Directed by Michael Sucsy. Starring Rachel McAdams, Channing Tatum, Scott Speedman, Sam Neill and Jessica Lange. 120 minutes. 14A

I saw this movie on Valentine's Day (hold your judgement) and on a discount Tuesday, so needless to say, there was a line wrapping around the movie's entrance. And while I can't say it was completely worth the wait, it wasn't entirely regrettable. Actually, I can't say I hold any firm stance on this movie at all.

I love romances. But that being said, I'm extremely picking about the romances I see. I'm not really into rom-coms, unless it stars Drew Barrymore, though I've seen nearly all the Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Lopez and Kate Hudson ones, plus more. I'm into what I feel is a representation of true, honest, passionate love, ie. the likes of Moulin Rouge!, Cold Mountain and such. Truthfully, I probably wouldn't have seen The Vow if not for some convincing from my own real life love (and when else better to be lovey dovey than on Valentine's Day). Turns out, it's watchable. Though that's about it.

The story follows young married couple Paige (Rachel McAdams) and Leo (Channing Tatum) who are truly, madly, deeply (cue the Savage Garden song) in love, until she smashes her head through the wind shield in a car accident and forgets who he is.

Full disclosure: I became a Channing Tatum un-fan just prior to seeing this movie. For me, and I'd think most, hosting SNL the weekend before this movie came out probably hurt it more than promoted it because he was so utterly unfunny. I fell asleep after I could take no more of the stripper jokes. Had The Vow actually been really good, I might have been convinced that I was wrong about him, but instead, I've discovered that he's neither good at comedy nor romance. I'm not betting on drama or anything else really.

McAdams was cute and charming as usual, though that wasn't enough to make it through bad writing. The movie a much sadder concept than its execution. I could get teary just thinking about it. I didn't feel for these characters, yet I felt for the real-life couple whose actual story I never really knew. Meanwhile, Jessica Lange could use more screen time (as she always could).

Admittedly, it wasn't as corny as I'd expected. It had potential. It just wasn't executed well. I have an idea! Let's rewrite it! Ryan Gosling can star as the lead, it'll be set in the 1940s in South Carolina and they will share a very passionate kiss in the pouring rain. Ah, much better. B-

14.2.12

DVDs for V-Day: Love Stories

I'm a hopeless romantic and as such, I can't help but be drawn to epic romance stories. I'm not too big on campy rom-coms (though I've seen too many of them) and I'm not into second chances (true love gets it right the first time). I'm into stories about deeply honest, pure love that goes to no ends to make sure that it is fulfilled. It also helps if someone tragically dies at the end.

This Valentine's Day, I'd like to ask you to suspend disbelief for a few moments and indulge in these moving, deeply emotional stories about love.

4) COLD MOUNTAIN


While Inman (Jude Law) and Ada (Nicole Kidman) are separated throughout most of the film, it's their enduring distant love that pulls you in. Although conscripted in the American Civil War, Inman can't help but follow his heart back to Ada, even if it means deserting the war. Meanwhile, as he treks his way back to her, Ada is left to worry about his safe return, while mourning the death of her father and trying to work the family farm without him. It's a story about hope and faith in a love that endures what feels like endless time to findally be reunited.

3) THE NOTEBOOK


It's tough to put The Notebook on this list without fear of being cliché, but I have to do it. There's a reason that this movie resonates as one of the greatest modern love stories of all time. It's about a guy, Noah (Ryan Gosling), who's unrelenting in chasing his true love, Allie (Rachel McAdams), when things being to fall apart after their picture-perfect summer. Through years of pain and waiting, Noah is unyielding, making for a very bitter-sweet ending.

2) KITES


This underrated Bollywood movie has been one of the most surprising movies I've seen in the past couple years. While it seems much of Bollywood dismisses it because it's so different from their usual fare (no dance numbers, a mix of languages, and extremely rebellious), it's gone mostly unnoticed by the rest of the world who don't look out for Bollywood exports. J (Hrithik Roshan) is an American who marries immigrant women to get them green cards, but when he marries Mexican woman Linda (Bárbara Mori), he feels there's something more there. Meanwhile, she's actually engaged to someone else and plans for divorce once the arrangement is through. But after discovering their true feelings, divorce is out of the question. Of course, her fiancé doesn't take it well and the two flee the country, running from guns and threats and car chases, until they can finally be alone together.

1) MOULIN ROUGE


This is my favourite movie ever. Of all time. Just watching the trailer nearly makes me teary. It's the most epic love story I've ever seen. Christian (Ewan McGregor) is a "penniless writer" who falls in love with Satine (Nicole Kidman), a courtesan and star of the Moulin Rouge night club. Of course, their love can never be; her job prevents her from falling in love, especially with someone who can't afford to keep up with her demands. But their love is destined to be and despite all odds, they see it through. Aside from being a beautiful story, it's also got some of the most stunning set and costume design, along with truly convincing acting. It is the most emotional movie I've ever seen.

DVDs for V-Day: Love/Hate Stories

I swear I'm not here to piss on love stories.

In all honesty, I have much love for more than a few well-known wistful weepies (see: the Brokeback Mountain still kicking around my bedroom wall). But, to build on an idea dreamed up by a possible plagiarist of an Englishman, I think love is much more interesting (not to mention real) when its either sprung from, or becomes remains steeped in, some form of highly repressed hate. And no, it's not because I'm perpetually single. (Although, I'm sure it helps.)

This Valentine's Day let's buck the happily ever afters and those til-death-do-us-part paramours, and celebrate the anti-romances we can't help but love.


4) WHO'S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF?


When I was in high school, I read the Edward Albee play which this 1966 film based on. Immediately, I compared it to my then-favourite movie, American Beauty. Looking back now, I admit there are some similarities between the two  - American dreams indefinitely deferred, fully grown couples acting like children towards one another - but this is much more heartbreaking. While American Beauty takes moments to grace our cheeks with rose petals and smidgens of helpless hope, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? laps up the irksomeness, focusing solely on an awkward dinner party between jaggedly jaded, long-married man and wife, George and Martha (real-life doomed duo, Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor), and their clueless newlywed guests. Martha's words are so cutting towards her husband at times, her tongue ought to fly off.


3) BLUE VALENTINE


This 2010 drama was almost completely ignored come awards season due to its adverse effect on audiences, who apparently wanted to see Michelle Williams and Ryan Gosling cuddle and make like Mr. and Mrs. Smith (no, not the Angelina/Brad kind) for two hours. What they got instead was something groundbreaking - an up close and too personal (both in script and suggestive shooting) exploration of a relationship that never really was and thus, never really can be, through the eyes of two, equally unremarkable characters. What they got was far too many people's harsh truth.


2) REVOLUTIONARY ROAD 


Before this film, an adaptation of the Richard Yates novel of the same name, was released, it was touted as the much-awaited Jack and Rose reunion we had been waiting for since '97. But unlike Titanic, which brought a fresh-faced Leo DiCaprio and a fire-haired Kate Winslet together through the bow of a boat and the belts of Celine Dion, Revolutionary Road doesn't even try for a happy, heaven-set ending.  Every aspect of this 1950s suburbia-set drama - the bleak coloured clothes, the slow-progressing storyline, and DiCaprio and Winslet's brilliantly vacant, Oscar-deserving (but not nominated) performances - is depressing. But then again, so were plenty of marriages back then, when divorce was a fate worse than death.


1) SID AND NANCY



This one takes the poisoned chocolate cake simply because its doomed subjects - who led destructive, drug- and dagger-addled side-by-side lives until one of them died in a hotel bathroom - were real. The 1986 biopic documents the way-highs and skin-crawling lows of the infamously short-lived romance between Sex Pistols bassist Sid Vicious and his peroxide-happy girlfriend, Nancy Spungen.

Vicious and Spungen's journey was a dirty, sex, suicide pact and syringe-filled one, a fact that is not only admitted in this film, but embraced with reckless artistic abandon. Director Alex Webb brings out an unmatched (unless you count this), brutally infected rawness in his stars, Gary Oldman and Chloe Webb, making much of the movie, which is made up mostly of long-winded verbal and physical fights followed by rabid love-making, near-unbearable to watch. But there's also macabre beauty to all of it, like when Oldman takes to an empty, florescent light-covered stage to sing Vicious cover of "My Way" to his barbed wire crowned babe, or the bloody pair embrace in what will become one of their death beds.

30.11.11

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 1

(Dawn of the undead newlywed.)
 Photo: Summit Entertainment

Starring Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner. Directed by Bill Condon. PG. 117 minutes.

Like the first half of the book it's based on, Breaking Dawn, Part 1 doesn't totally suck. It's what every 17-year-old looking vampire should be: fun, sexy and, from the right angle, drop dead gorgeous. Even those who don't own a Team Edward or a Team Jacob baby tee may find themselves harbouring a Twihard-on by the badass end credits (seriously, they're really cool) of this easily entertaining film, arguably the best in supernaturally popular teen series. 

Unlike the previous three instalments, this, the fourth and second-to-last entry in the Twilight Saga, Breaking Dawn, Part 1 isn't an overly romantic, cheesy mess. Sure, the vamp make-up is still on the chalky side, and the wolf FX are as howl-worthy as ever (one particularly fuzzy were meet-up will have you over the moon ... with laughter), but the script is tidier, the editing is tighter and the action, both in the forest and between the sheets, is both fast-paced and tasteful. That is, if your taste leans towards the sullenly (or should I say, Cullenly?) sweet.

Haters can blame the new director, Dreamgirls' Bill Condon, for the new, not-so-bad-after-all vibe. He is working with the same sort of girly lines and Stephenie Meyer-penned sentiments screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg has tweaked yet again for the screen, but he makes them seem earnest as opposed to overwrought by not goofing around too much with stylized lighting, scenery and or the indie music soundtrack (see: Catherine Hardwicke's Twilight). Aside from one, PG-13 Magic School Bus-evoking innard swimming sequence, Condon keeps it simple, letting the admittedly over-the-top story speak for itself.

For those who haven't read the book, Breaking Dawn focuses in on Bella and Edward's marriage and honeymoon, and the effect both have on her human life and relationships, including of course, her connection to the other mythical man in her life, Taylor Lautner's Jacob. To avoid spoiling it for you, let's just say the vampire-human union gets bloody real fast, and not in the way your dirty, fang-girl mind might expect.

Breaking Dawn, Part 1 gives fans what they want - actual side booby love scenes and a mini bucket of gore - but it's nothing a 13-year-old couldn't handle. In fact, you could argue that the, ahem, climatic moments are almost too tame. The treatments make sense given the core demographic (teens and tweens) and current rating restrictions, but it would have been nice to see Condon push the limits a bit more, pleasing some of us oft-forgotten older fans.

Speaking of aging, Lautner has certainly grown up since the last film, the ill-fitting Stewart wig-filled disaster that was Eclipse.  The boy has facial hair now, which seems much more in character (not to mention 100 per cent less jailbaity), and bears his teeth this time around, and not just when he's wolfed-out. He's not overused either, which is a nice surprise given Jacob's heavy involvement in the book, where his first-person observations were given nearly as much time as Bella's.

As per usual, Pattinson and Stewart don't do much other than ogle each other awkwardly and make-out intensely as Edward and Bella. But come to really think about it, there's not much else to Mr. and Mrs. Cullen anyway. As Anna Kendrick's ever-sassy Jessica says at their wedding, who else actually gets married at 18 these days? Especially when there's not an MTV special in it for them.

The only thing that really bothered this one-time Team Edward leader about Breaking Dawn, Part 1 was its ending. It wasn't bad by any means. In fact, it was the perfect cut-off. But now I know what's left for Part 2. And if you've suffered through the last, out-of-control hundred pages of the book, you know what comes next bites the big sparkly cold one. Hard. B

14.11.11

Restless

Photo: Scott Green

Starring Mia Wasikowska and Henry Hopper. Directed by Gus Van Sant. 91 minutes. PG

Restless is the super sappy love story attempt by director Gus Van Sant starring Henry Hopper (Dennis Hopper's son) and Mia Wasikowska (Alice in Wonderland and Jane Eyre). Van Sant has always been a director that I keep an eye out for, especially after 2003's Elephant. He does not disappoint in this film in terms of style and minimalism. He catches the current 20 something's climate perfectly. Though there is the ever constant teenage "the world is ending" attitude, I didn't feel it overpowered the undercurrent of new love and fun hats. He really let the two youngens try and work out their weird story on their own, similar to his style in Elephant.

2.11.11

DVD: Crazy Stupid Love

 

That is such a cliche. So says Steve Carells character as a rain storm suddenly pours down after his lowest moment in Crazy Stupid Love.

If youve only seen the trailer (with that overly swelling Muse soundtrack), you might be tempted to say the same about the romantic dramedy, which documents in a semi-Love, Actually style, the various types and stages of L-O-V-E. And indeed, there are plenty of expected and not-totally-fresh feel good moments throughout the film. However, like a solid long-term relationship, there are just enough surprises to keep you not only interested but genuinely excited. Some are crazy (Josh Grobanyes, that Josh Grobanplaying a lawyer!?). Some are stupid (Marisa Tomei jumping Steve Carells bones with crazy eyed aplomb). But most of it is just, to quote Eliza Doolittle, loverly. Really, really, really loverly.

Read the rest of Emily’s review.

22.9.11

The Filles Take TIFF!: Friends With Kids


Photo: Lionsgate

Starring Jennifer Westfeldt, Kristen Wiig, Megan Fox, Jon Hamm, Maya Rudolph and Adam Scott. Directed by Jennifer Westfeldt. 100 minutes. 14A

If you get one thing out of Friends With Kids, it’s that Bridesmaids was much more than just a great ensemble cast.

You see, Jennifer Westfeldt’s directing debut (you may know her as the star of Kissing Jessica Stein), features the majority of the main cast of that surprise hit of a rom-com (Kristen Wiig, Chris O’Dowd, Maya Rudolph and of course, Westfeldt’s long-time bf, Jon Hamm). And yet, it can’t even begin to live up to it in laughs and or sincerity.

Friends With Kids is like a toddler you’re forced to babysit for your pseudo-bud from work. It’s fine at first, pretty easy-going and even entertaining, but after about an hour, the little one starts to get grating and you start to get stupid bored. You really wish you things would start looking up for you and the kid—or rather, you and this well-meaning, yet meandering movie—but in truth, you just want get home and jump back in your non blankie-infested bed.

The concept of the film is slightly original, or at least a tad different for the current chick flick climate. Instead of focusing simply on a desperate single gal with a ticking clock, Friends With Kids follows two opposite sex BFFs (Westfeldt and Parks and Recreation’s always adorable Adam Scott) who decide to have a kid together because, well, they really want one (and all their friends have already done it—and totally changed). It all gets off on a perfectly platonic foot, with Mama and Papa still happily dating other peeps post-placenta. But things get tricky (or to continue with the metaphor, trippy?) when one of them develops more than faux-familial feelings for the other.

The story may ring true for many modern families, but as a movie, it comes across weirdly false and hopelessly predictable. It’s not Westfeldt or Scott’s fault (they have a sweet, sweet chemistry) but rather, the overly glossy cinematography and juvenile jokes. Okay, so maybe it is a bit of Westfeldt’s fault. (Sorry, Mrs. Draper!)

The problem with Friends With Kids is that it’s decidedly indecisive, forever unsure what side of rom-com it stands on. Sometimes this can work (see: Bridesmaids), but only if the flick maintains the back-and-forth and never officially commits to either side. The first twenty minutes of Friends may be really funny in a frank, adult way, but the second half is purely kids stuff: corny, skittish and poop joke-filled.  C

9.8.11

Crazy, Stupid, Love

 
 Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures

Starring Steve Carell, Ryan Gosling, Julianne Moore and Emma Stone. Directed by Glenn Ficarra and John Requa. 118 minutes. PG

"That is such a cliche." So says Steve Carell's character as a rain storm suddenly pours down after his lowest moment in Crazy Stupid Love.

If you've only seen the trailer (with that overly swelling Muse soundtrack), you might be tempted to say the same about the romantic dramedy, which documents in a semi-Love, Actually style, the various types and stages of L-O-V-E. And indeed, there are plenty of expected and not-totally-fresh feel good moments throughout the film. However, like a solid long-term relationship, there are just enough surprises to keep you not only interested but genuinely excited. Some are crazy (Josh Groban--yes, that Josh Groban--playing a lawyer!?). Some are stupid (Marisa Tomei jumping Steve Carell's bones with crazy eyed aplomb). But most of it is just, to quote Eliza Doolittle, loverly. Really, really, really loverly.

The main story (as I said, there are several) is an all-too-familiar one, both in real and reel life. Cal and Emily, (Steve Carell and Julianne Moore), a middle-aged couple and former high school sweethearts, are forced to separate after one of them (Moore) becomes restless with their non-heated sex life and has a reckless affair with a coworker (Kevin Bacon). He moves into a second-rate bachelor pad. She stays in their gorgeous suburban house with the kids. No one is truly happy.

One night, as Cal drowns his sorrows in a vodka cran at a local singles watering hole, he's befriend by Jacob (a tanned and tenacious Ryan Gosling), a perfectly coiffed womanizer with a secretly perfect heart. Jake gives him a haircut, a new, properly fitted wardrobe and very specific instructions on how to approach a lady suitor. Seeing as Cal was previously a one-woman-man, he struggles a bit with the transition. But as soon as he scores his first one-night-stand, he's a whole new, confident dude. But does he really love the single life, or is he still just pining away for his wife?

As Cal attempts to cope with losing what he thought was the love of his life, Jacob falls in love for the first time. The extremely lucky (Jake's stomach situation looks like it's been, to quote one character, "Photoshopped") lady? Whip smart, but slightly gutless twentysomething lawyer, Hannah (the ever-gorgeous, ever-hilarious Emma Stone of Easy A). The problem is, Hannah is already attached to a douchebag (the previously mentioned Groban) and Jake, well, he doesn't quite know how to woo a traditional, non-easy-going (if you know what I mean) gal.

There are a few other storylines, including one involving Cal and Emily's son (Jonah Bobo, Zathura) and his overwhelming attraction to his older babysitter (If Demi and Ashton can do it, why can't they!?) and another involving said babysitter's (Analeigh Tipton, TV's Hung) overwhelming attraction to Cal. But they border on cutesy and inappropriate at the best of times. It's easy to overlook them though, especially once Jacob and Hannah's story really starts up.

Carell and Moore are stunning as Cal and Emily (Carell, especially, showing the nuanced emotional range he gave, but no one really saw in Dan in Real Life) but Gosling and Stone are what make the film a true head-turner. Directors Glenn Ficarra and John Requa should have spent more time with the white hot duo. Not only are they fantastic individual actors (Gosling lets superbly loose, showing us why he started his career in comedy--Breaker High, bay-bee!--and why he will eventually win an Oscar), their chemistry is positively sparkling. Whether they're trying out a massage chair or reenacting a famous romantic movie scene, you can't keep your eyes off them.

Gosling and Stone would be nothing, however, without the sincerely charming script, courtesy of Dan Fogelman. Think of this film as the near-perfect summer rom-dram you wanted The Kids Are All Right to be. Sure, it doesn't break any new ground in terms of diversity like that film, but it's messages are, and I believe were meant to be, universal. 

Fogelman may be more familiar with fantasy (he wrote the animated flicks, Cars and Tangled), but Crazy, Stupid, Love is lighter than you'd expect bloated fairytale tropes and too-hopeless romanticism to be, and fairly heavy on relatable realities: feelings and situations that everyone has or has seen someone else experience (unrequited crushes, failed pick-up lines, lust) in the pursuit of the L word. The emotions can be, as the title evokes, big and a little messy at times, but hey, isn't that amore? A

22.7.11

Larry Crowne


Photo: Vendome International

Starring Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts. Directed by Tom Hanks. 98 minutes. PG

Larry Crowne is an indie(ish) film that seems like a high production film posing as an indie film. It's also directed by, co-written by and starring Tom Hanks; so it's like Tom Hanks: The Movie. And the whole time it's got this we're-good-friends-playing-lovers-and-we-think-that's-hilarious vibe going on. In short, it's very weird.

If you haven't already seen the trailer, the film follows Larry Crowne, who's just been let go from his Walmart-esque job because he doesn't have a college degree. So, he enrols in college. And then starts crushing on his teacher. You know how it goes.

As usual, Hanks and Julia Roberts are pretty good, though only separately. Their chemistry is off. It's like they know they're playing dress-up and they think it's the biggest joke ever. Their romance doesn't progress very realistically. It's almost as if someone sectioned off the script in two parts: the "strangers" half and the "in-love" half.

It's also sad to have the Nia Vardalos we are so often proud of (she wrote My Big Fat Greek Wedding and Connie and Carla... OK, maybe I'm just a big fan) attached to this script. Yes, big career step for her but in retrospect will probably be a stain.

It also feels that Talia's (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) entire purpose in the film was to add quirk. But it's way too overloaded and just comes across as ingenuine. She rides a scooter and has a faux-scooter gang. She's obsessed with thrift store scavenging. And she's a feng shui master. Oh, and she also kisses everyone on the lips. It's just too much.

I can't put it any other way except that this movie is just bad. I keep asking myself why I wanted to see this and I can't come up with any justifiable reason. Just don't do it. Not even on half-price Tuesday. D+

20.7.11

Don't You Forget About: Notting Hill


Sure, it's fun to catch the latest flick at the multiplex, or grab the newest release at a video store, but sometimes you just gotta say, "Out with the new, and in with the unknown." There are plenty of older flicks out there that are worth a rental, but never registered on your radar. In Don't You Forget About, we remember the long-gone gems, so you don't have to.



Photo: Polygram Filmed Entertainment

WHAT it's about: A demure travel book shop owner, William Thacker (God, even his name is dull) gets swept up in a tempestuously hot-and-stone-cold affair when movie star Anna Scott rolls into Notting Hill. Anna's "foul temper" (think Ava Gardner's bravado minus the sailor tongue) keeps the meek Briton at bay, but the poor bloke is nonetheless hooked, showering Anna and her outbursts with equal patience and admiration from his endless well of nice-guy understanding, as needed when crushing on the popular girl.

WHO's in it: Come for the great and beautiful Hugh Grant and well, still beautiful, Julia Roberts. Stay for the backseat hero, William's gamely Welsh roommate, Spike (Rhys Ifans) who can't keep his hands off himself. Directed by Roger Michell, whose latest rom-com, Morning Glory, couldn't recreate the same aw-shucks on-screen chemistry between Rachel McAdams and Patrick Wilson.

WHEN it came out: May 28, 1999

HOW come you haven't heard of (or just seen) it before: You tell me. Seriously. Eleven years ago, your excuse may have been the film's debut was sandwiched between the hotly anticipated releases of summer blockbusters, The Mummy and Star Wars Ep. 1: The Phantom Menace. Even still, the film grossed $363,728,226 US to date worldwide and sits at the 20th spot on the list of highest-grossing Hollywood rom-coms. And don't tell me you've never caught W Network's Saturday night Hugh Grant film spotlight. (I can't be the only steadfast Grant devoter to happily stay in for this...)

WHY you need to watch it-immediately!..

14.6.11

Midnight in Paris


Photo: Sony Pictures Classics

BY: Manori Ravindran

Starring Owen Wilson, Rachel McAdams and Marion Cotillard. Directed by Woody Allen. 100 minutes. PG

I can't express how often I wish I was born in another era. For me, it's the sixties in the U.S., with the dreamy allure of Bob Dylan, the Civil Rights movement and the Merry Pranksters. In Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris, struggling novelist Gil similarly yearns for another time: in his case, Paris in the 1920s. In this sweet and astute film about the trouble of wanting to be somewhere you're not, Allen channels observations about a restless society into one of his best films to date.

Owen Wilson is Gil, a successful Hollywood screenwriter who's trying his hand at writing novels. Visiting Paris with his fiancée Inez (Rachel McAdam) and her family, it becomes clear that his betrothed doesn't share his interest in the city's mystique. When Inez reunites with old friends, including hilarious one-upper Paul (Michael Sheen), Gil has a lot of time on his hands and takes to wandering the streets at night.

One evening, after getting into a car with beckoning strangers at the stroke of midnight, Gil finds he's been taken back in time to the 1920s. Suddenly, he's rubbing elbows with his literary heroes and falling for Picasso's mistress Adriana (Marion Cotillard). Much to the bewilderment of Inez, who is increasingly distant, Gil continues to wander off each evening, choosing fantasy over the reality of an ill-suited relationship. But as he goes further back in time, he soon realizes that even the most idyllic past can be someone else's dreary present.

For those unfamiliar with Allen's body of work, the director has almost annually churned out a feature film, television short or play since 1959. Perhaps it's not surprising, then, that Midnight in Paris warrants comparison to 1985's The Purple Rose of Cairo, another film where wistful characters are drawn into their fantasies, which provide only fleeting respite from reality.

Midnight works on many levels. Unlike many of his more recent films, there's no bumbling, neurotic male lead. Sure, Gil's intelligent, but he's no intellectual, and the particular casting of the laid-back Wilson makes for a character that's likeable from the very start. A strong supporting cast of McAdams, whose mean streak re-emerges in a turn as the petulant Inez, and Sheen, as her tedious charmer, is terrific. Allen also challenges the audience to a battle of wits, introducing a bevy of literary and artistic icons to keep us guessing. As usual, the director doesn't underestimate his audience, and expects us to keep pace with the many arcane references that constitute the average Woody Allen film.

Ultimately, what's most appealing about Midnight in Paris is that it draws upon the nostalgia most of us feel for the past, whether it's our own or a different time period entirely. Allen allows us to live out our fantasies through Gil, who gets a real shot at his. Best of all, the director balances each dose of make believe and real life without getting ensconced in either. The past and present of Midnight in Paris aren't separate entities; instead, they affect one another drastically.

For Woody Allen fans who've been sleepwalking through the director's last few films, Midnight in Paris is a brilliant reminder of why it is we blindly subscribe to his genius. And for newcomers who just want to see a romantic comedy on a Tuesday night, it may be the start of a beautiful relationship. A

12.2.11

DVD: Never Let Me Go



Photo: amazon.ca

Starring Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield and Keira Knightley. Directed by Mark Romanek. 100 minutes. 14A

Categorizing Never Let Me Go as a dystopian film sets off the wrong preconceptions: zombies, battles between man and machine, lasers. And calling it a love story does the same. But bringing the two together creates a genre in itself. It's not a flimsy love story alongside a dystopian narrative; it is, in part, the dystopia. Dystopian love. Poetic, right?

I can't tell you what's at the core of Never Let Me Go without giving away more than you learn from the trailer, and really, the most I can say is that it's thoughtful, reflective love story that rests heavily on a destructive, pre-determined fate set out by society. Kathy (Carey Mulligan), Tommy (Andrew Garfield) and Ruth (Keira Knightley) are scientific subjects of sorts, and are pretty much treated that way as they live out the roadmap written for them.

While it's undeniable that Mulligan, Garfield and Knightley work well together, it's Garfield who stands out in this film as the socially awkward though sweet Tommy. It makes you wonder why he was nominated for his role in The Social Network for a Golden Globe and completely ignored in this film where he played one half of couple where he misread feelings, fell to deceit, and fought to live for love, all the while balancing naivety with pure honesty.

What's surprising about this film is that's not overdone, as love stories easily are, especially when they are the main narrative. Although it's the love story that drives the film, weighing it against such a heavy, treacherous dystopia evens it out. And while the two aspects are very powerful on their own, and even more so when combined, together they work to create a real portrait of humanity in an unreal world, reminding us that despite our different situations, we all feel emotions just as passionately. A-

DVD EXTRAS: Behind-the-scenes featurettes and on-set photos.

20.1.11

DVD: The Switch


Photo: amazon.ca

Starring Jason Bateman, Jennifer Aniston, Jeff Goldblum, Patrick Wilson, Juliette Lewis and Thomas Robinson. Directed by Josh Gordon and Will Speck. 100 minutes. 14A

Rom-coms are very predictable; that's just the way they are - especially the mainstream ones headlined by big names, which should be a clear reason to avoid seeing The Switch. If it weren't for the guilty pleasure factor, not to mention directed by the same guys who did Blades of Glory, starring Jason Bateman, and, best of all, based on a short story by The Virgin Suicides author Jeffrey Eugenides. Actually, for those reasons, this film should be awesome, shouldn't it?

Forty-year-old Kassie Larson (Jennifer Aniston) realizes if she doesn't have a baby now, she may never, and seeing as she isn't in a long-term relationship, she decides to seek the help of a donor against the advice of her neurotic best bud Wally Mars (Bateman). Though maybe the reason Wally's so against it is because she doesn't want his little swimmers, she wants Roland's (Patrick Wilson), a man she's never met who needs to money to support his own family. But on the night of her insemination party (yeah, that's right), after Roland's left his "ingredient" in Kassie's bathroom, a drunk Wally steps in to find it and accidentally wash it down the drain, however that happens, and in his drunkenness, finds an easily accessible replacement for the "ingredient." When he wakes up, the previous night is a blank, until seven years later, when he meets Sebastian (Thomas Robinson), Kassie's cute, but neurotic, son.

The Switch follows on the same "I can have a baby without a man" strain as The Back-up Plan, though both backtrack on this feminist idea, saying rather "Yes, I can technically have a baby without a man, but in truth, I will always need a man." It's pretty sad though it would be uncharacteristic of the genre any other way. A woman who chooses to live without the man could only be the woman of a drama or rom-com flop.

Though what makes this film watchable is Bateman and Robinson. Robinson is so perfectly cast as Wally's mini-me and the two make such a believable, offbeat pair. Wally is not your typical beefcake. He's nerdy, awkward and a realist. He is the anti-Matthew McConaughey of romantic comedies (though McConaughey's a pro of the genre in his own right). Then, Sebastian is the tyke-sized version, who collects picture frames and has hypochondria.

However, while this film is more watchable than most rom-coms, it's also a letdown. Blades of Glory was hilarious, though this film falls miles behind that mark in the humour department. And I never would have guessed that a film based work by the author who wrote my favourite book ever could be so banal. I guess that's what happens when you search for reasons to look forward to a rom-com. B-

14.12.10

12 Days of Festive Faves: Love, Actually

 
Photo: impaawards.com

Love, Actually (2003)

THE GIST: An assortment of  once-burned Brits (and a few imported Americans) - including a privately pining prime minister (Hugh Grant!) and his sweet-hearted secretary, a widower (Liam Neeson) and his lonely loner of a stepson, a self-appointed local sex god and his American wet dreams, an aging rocker (Bill Nighy) and his agent BFF, Colin Firth and his language-challenged crush, a selfless workaholic (Laura Linney) and nerd-sexy office stud (Rodrigo Santoro), and, hold onto your broomsticks, Trelawney and Snape (!!)  - show us that Christmas 'tis the season for lovin' - of all kinds. Think Valentine's Day with UK slang and sleigh bells. And WAY better writing/acting.

NAUGHTY OR NICE?:
It's got a sweet seasonal message, but there are some definite not-suitable-for-Santa-shipper moments. Case in point: the entire sidestory about sex scene standins who may or may not be made for each other.

WHY IT GETS US IN THE SPIRIT: This bittersweet flick reminds us that, despite what the big box stores tell us, Christmas really is about spending times with the ones you, well, you know.

MAGIC MOMENT: Okay so it has nothing to do with December 25th - but you can't help but keel over when Hugh Grant randomly lip synches for his life to the Pointer Sisters' "Jump for My Love."

SANTA SIGHTING!: No Mr. Claus here. But you do get to see some super-toned semi-naked chaps rockin' his hats. And the first lobster! (Watch and giggle incessantly.)

ACCOMPANYING CAROL: "Christmas is All Around" by the great Billy Mack. Or Olivia Olsen's "heavenly" cover of "All I Want For Christmas Is You." Both are out-of-control awesome.

PERFECT PRESENT FOR: The Bridget Jones in your life. Or rather, any 20-something girly girl who likes to party with Ben, Jerry, Hugh and Colin too.

16.9.10

DVD: Letters to Juliet

Photo: amazon.com

Starring Amanda Seyfried, Christopher Egan, Vanessa Redgrave and Gael Garcia Bernal. Directed by Gary Winick. 105 Minutes. PG.

If Letters to Juliet were a colour is would be pink. The pale, yet warm girly pink that lines little girls' bedrooms and makes you think of strawberry ice cream, lip gloss and carnations.

Letters to Juliet begins as the romantic comedy that isn't yet aware that it's a romantic comedy. Sophie Hall (Amanda Seyfried) is a fact-checker with The New Yorker who dreams of being a writer. She's engaged to a soon-to-be restaurateur (Gael Garcia Bernal) and we're supposed to believe that they're in love, although he neglects her. When the two go on a trip to Verona, Italy for their "pre-honeymoon," the distance between them swells even more. Aside from the fact that he's too busy doing prep for his restaurant, he doesn't even let her finish her sentences.

This is the biggest problem with the film. In order to believe that a relationship is falling apart, we need to first believe that a relationship was there, and the film doesn't convince us of this. It's hard to imagine that the two were even ever remotely attracted to each other. He ignores her and doesn't care about her life and it's impossible to believe that he ever did.

One day during her Verona trip, Sophie is spending the afternoon on her own when she comes across Juliet's wall. It's supposedly the wall near Juliet Capulet's home where women write teary love-sore letters and pin them to the wall for Juliet to read and reply. At the end of a day, a woman collects them all in a basket. Sophie sees this and follows the woman through town to find that a handful of women writing replies to the letters. They ask Sophie to join them and, with nothing else to do on her pointless pre-honeymoon, she does. While collecting letters, she finds one hidden behind a brick from 50 years past. It's about a woman (Vanessa Redgrave) who has run away from her true love and Sophie undertakes it as her duty to reply. The next day, the woman returns to Verona and Sophie joins her on a mad chase throughout the region to find the long-lost Romeo.

It's difficult to say how well roles were played because with such a corny script, it's impossible to avoid corny acting. It's a bit disappointing to see Seyfried in this film after having seen her performance in Chloe, but it's the script that brings her down. Nothing in this film seems genuine, especially when after 50 years apart, true love reunites a couple and they're both so unattached to their lives that they completely throw themselves at each other and ignore anything else that ever was.

What's also cliché is the soundtrack, far too Disney. You're almost waiting for her to spin through a pink, sparkly haze and come out a princess. It's hard to recognize Taylor Swift's "Love Story" when it plays because it's just such an obvious song choice that you'd think it would never be chosen.

But what was most ridiculous about the film was Sophie being a fact-checker. At least it only lasts for about five minutes. Unfortunately, the DVD last for 105 minutes, extended an entire 10 painful more minutes than the theatrical version. C-

EXTRAS: Commentary with cast and director, deleted and (dreadfully) extended scenes, featurettes

15.9.10

DVD: Just Wright

Photo: amazon.ca

Starring Queen Latifah, Common and Paula Patton. Directed by Sanaa Hamri. 101 minutes.

You know what this film is about. I'm tell you right now. Take a look at the cover: two smiling lovebirds, arm in arm, clearly entranced by one another. Trust yourself. There are no surprises here.

We always think we know what to expect from rom-coms and most of the time, we do. Rare times, a film turns out to be something so surprisingly fresh and unexpected, but sweet all the same. This is not one of those times.

Just Wright is exactly what you think it's about. It follows the typical rom-com arc: love, conflict, resolution. It feels so pointless to explain, so I won't. Well, nothing more than man + woman + basketball = love.

Sometimes, rom-coms are so cheesy that it's fun to guess the next line out loud or narrate a character's thoughts in an overly-dramatic moment of silence, but what happens when a film actually seems like it's trying hard to be novel yet is swirling in an abyss of cliché? You kind of feel bad for laughing. But you do it anyway.

A couple messages to the actors trying oh-so-mightily to charm in this film. Queen Latifah, you are better than this. When was the last time you watched yourself in Chicago? Or more recently, even Hairspray? You are not meant to be a rom-com pawn. And Common, neither are you. You're hardcore villain. Seriously. That line in Date Night: "Get up. Now." You could build an entire career out of badass lines like that. It's tough to take anything you say in this film gently when you should be pointing a gun is someone's face fixed with that mean stare of yours.

There also doesn't seem to be a lot of chemistry between Queen Latifah and Common. Leslie Wright (Queen Latifah) is very lecturing and Scott McKnight (Common) is too stubborn. It comes across more as a mother-son relationship and these are not the things mothers and sons should be doing together. It's not like they couldn't have made an awesome duo but that would have to have been another film, with guns and fight scenes and a plot revolving around stolen money.

There's not much else to say about a film that you've already seem without seeing, other than don't waste your time. D+

EXTRAS: Featurettes, gag reel

20.8.10

Stay Classy: Pretty Woman


Maybe you’ve never heard of it. Maybe you’ve always wanted to see it. Or maybe you’re just tired of the new. Whatever your reason, the classics are always worth a nod. Every Friday in Stay Classy, we look some of the films that started it all and how they hold up today. So sit back while we reel through the past. 

Photo: EW.com
 (Meet, pay, love.)

There''s a scene in the underated rom-com opus, Romy and Michele's High School Reunion, where the titular gal pals take in a midafternoon, bed-ridden screening of Pretty Woman. All dolled up in assorted food-themed earrings and teased hair, the blonde BFFs, sit and laugh at the so-called classic because as the less jaded of the over-bejeweled twosome (Michele) says, even though they've seen it "like, 36 times, [they] never get tired of making fun of it."

As they sit and smirk at the screen, Michele's partner-in-fashion-crimes (Platforms at the gym? As if!) points out the ridiculously sad music that plays after Julia's character leaves that high-end store, empty-handed and still-decked in her monokini dress and well, hooker boots (the staff wouldn't serve her or her skanky outfit, although she claimed to have cash to burn). But then that infamous, euphoric shopping spree scene comes on their criminally small TV and suddenly, Michele changes her charmingly empty mind and her superior smirk turns into a genuine smile. Romy gives her a death stare for it, but she keeps giggling, explaining sheepishly, "I just get really happy when they finally let her shop."

When it comes to Pretty Woman, you're either a Romy or a Michele - totally cynical and doubtful or sort-of  into it in a totally shallow, guilty-pleasure way. Because, despite all it's "classic" claims, it really isn't that great. Sure, it's cute and sorta funny, but that's about it. In fact, if it hadn't starred Richard Gere and Julia Roberts, it probably wouldn't have registered on anyone's radar. Or at least ended up in the bottom of a Wal-Mart DVD bin with the rest of the early 90s dramedy rejects.

Let's face it, Pretty Woman is pretty dated. The storyline, a prostitute Pygmalion (Roberts' lady-of-the-night heroine, Vivia,  meets lonely, older business dude, Edward, who sweeps her, and her rubber-filled pleather shoes, off her feet and introduces her to the finer things in life - credit cards, operas, horse races and L-O-V-E) has been beaten to death repeatedly by the romantic comedy genre (see: She's All That or any movie that features a hooker-with-a-heart of gold). In addition, Vivian's clothes are 90s garish - even for a former streetwalker. And don't get me started on the cinematography, which is a victim of the late-80s haute haziness. Oh, and who can identify with jamming out to a Prince tape on your Walkman, anymore?

But I digress. Despite the obvious time warp-y feel, Pretty Woman can still be charming, especially when you look at Gere and Roberts' endless chemistry. Like every Eliza Doolite/Henry Higgins in history (well, that I've seen anyways), the duo have the perfect love-hate relationship. They bicker and make fun of each other constantly, but deep down, they really respect each others quirks, they're just afraid to express it directly. And when they do, it's sort of awkward awesome. Like when Edward presents her with that beautiful necklace before heading out to opera house, but closes the box on her hand before she can touch it. On cue, Vivian giggles like a school girl - half-scared, half-tickled-pink -  and we fall in love with them both.

Apparently, Roberts and Gere improvised that well-known exchange. The director (Garry Marshall - who just reunited with Roberts on Valentine's Day) just loved it so much, he kept it in the movie. And no wonder. It's brilliant. There's a reason those two signed on to do Runaway Bride years later. And we all know it wasn't the script.

The real problem with Pretty Woman is that it really is nothing more than a PG-13 fairytale. From the minute Edward picks Vivian up, we know we aren't going to be treated to another sleazy tryst (I mean, the theme song is Roy Orbison, for God's sake). And even when they're relationship gets strained, we know that somehow these two are going to end up together in some sort of urbanized princess setting (Hello, ghetto fire escape!). Although yes, it's nice to see a happy ending, it's also kind of boring. Especially in today's post-(500) Days of Summer cinematic world.

Although plenty of rom-com purists still sing its praises, after re-watching Pretty Woman for like, the 20th time, I've decided that I'll always be a Michele. I have always been morally obligated to love it a little bit because I'm a big fan of Miss Roberts (I wrote a post-Erin Brockovich speech about her career for my Grade 6 public speaking competiton. I'm still surprised I didn't win that baby). And yes, part of me loves seeing tell those Rodeo drive bitches off in her brand-new outfit. But I think that's because I love Julia. Not Vivian.

18.8.10

Don't You Forget About: Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge


Sure, it's fun to catch the latest flick at the multiplex, or grab the newest release at a video store, but sometimes you just gotta say, "Out with the new, and in with the unknown." There are plenty of older flicks out there that are worth a rental, but never registered on your radar. In Don't You Forget About, we remember the long-gone gems, so you don't have to.

Photo: source unknown

Before Shahrukh Khan and Kajol fell in love in Kabhi Kushi Kabhie Gham, before they fell in love in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, they fell in love in Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge. They also fell in love in a dozen other movies and this wasn't the first but this was the first time it wasn't Shahrukh Khan's character in disguise or as a reincarnation! And for that reason and a whole lot more, it's one of the realest, revered and memorable of Hindi films.

Simran Singh (Kajol) is a teenage girl. She's a hopeless romantic who writes poetry in her diary and she's in love, except she hasn't met him yet. She's seen him in her dreams and she knows she loves him. She doesn't know what he looks like or where he is, but he's out there. The day after she confesses to her mother about far-off, mysterious lover, her father gets a letter in the mail. The boy she was promised to as a child was now of age and ready to get married. It's OK to dream, her mother tells her that night, but not to expect any dreams to come true. Simran, wanting to make her father happy, agrees to the marriage on the condition that she's allowed one month to freely live her life on a trip to Europe. He allows her. Meanwhile, rich kid Raj Malholtra (Khan) has just failed college and plans a trip to Europe just for kicks. You know what happens next.

Many Hindi films have one similar theme. It's all about love succeeding. That's not to say that DDLJ strays far from that but what makes this film different is it's all about questioning the idea of love succeeding. Is there anything more important than love? More important than your happiness? More important than being with the one you've dreamed of? One of the clear challenges this film tackles is the tradition of arranged marriages, and where family wishes and culture fit into following your heart. It's about making choices, weighing what's logically right and what just feels right. In this, the film also questions how much you should rely on fate, and whether you the viewer should trust Hindi film formulas. They're supposed to be together; they're in love. In Hindi films, love is supposed to trump all, but what if that doesn't happen?

What's also great about this film is the soundtrack and the musical scenes. In contrast to many Bollywood musical numbers, they're really subdued and emotional, beautifully illustrating what's going on in the film at that point. It's not about showing off choreography abruptly mid-scene, but rather about moving the narrative along through music.

We also see in a couple of the musical numbers bright saris scattered, spinning, dancing through a field. DDLJ makes stunning use of fields, which is clear even on the film's poster. Cinematography in this film is gorgeous as a whole. Whether it's Kajol running through a spanning field from above into Shahrukh Khan's arms or a quick close-up on her hazel eyes, it's brilliant. Being set in the European countryside, of course, helps.

If you're new to Hindi films, DDLJ is possibly the perfect film to start with. It's heartfelt, beautiful and you'll wish you spoke Hindi to sing along with the songs, not to mention, it's Bollywood mega-stars Shahrukh Khan and Kajol in one of their best.

16.7.10

Stay Classy: Rebel Without a Cause


Maybe you’ve never heard of it. Maybe you’ve always wanted to see it. Or maybe you’re just tired of the new. Whatever your reason, the classics are always worth a nod. Every Friday in Stay Classy, we look some of the films that started it all and how they hold up today. So sit back while we reel through the past.

 Photo: EW.com
(He's a rebel. He's a saint.)

This Wednesday I caught an advanced screening of the new Zac Efron vehicle, Charlie St. Cloud. Over the course of the cheesy drama, I fell for Mr. Efron once again (I've been having Zac attacks since I  watched the first HSM), entranced by his boyish brooding, forever-furrowed brows and puppy dog pout. As I sat there, giddy as a hopeless Biebliever, I started to wonder where this stupid-in-lust big-screen teen icon business began, or rather who I should blame for my irrational desire to squeal every time Zac moves (it's a disease). What I came up with was not Elvis or his pelvis (too musical, I think) but the godfather of cinematic teenage rebellion, fellow blue-eyed brooder, Mr. James Dean.

Like Efron, Dean made it big on TV before blowing up movie houses with East of Eden. After getting his big break, he landed his first official starring role, the lead character in the classic teen drama, Rebel Without a Cause. Even if you haven't seen this movie, you've undoubtedly heard of it, or seen a picture of Dean in that unforgettable red jacket. If you're anything like me, you were immediately enticed by that pictoral, and Dean's perfectly pensive expression. But you really need to watch it in it's full-out Cinoscope glory to get a full grasp of how delighfully dreamy Dean, and the state of teen cinema, was back in the 1950s.

Rebel Without a Cause follows Jim Stark (Dean), the new kid at Dawson High, a school somewhere in suburban L.A. Jim's never been able to catch a break at his old schools (apparently, his family moves every time he acts out), and he's really sick of it and his totally detached parentals. He just wants to find somewhere he fits in. Enter Dawson High hottie, Judy (Natalie Wood) and adoring bro, Plato (Sal Mineo), both of whom seem entranced by the purposeful troublemaker. But, like every other teen movie misfit of the last fifty years, Jim's also makes enemies: tough-guy Buzz (Corey Allen) and his gang of greaser goons. They challenge him to a game of chicken with stolen cars. Jim hates being called a chicken more than he hates lines, and so he agrees. But when things get out of hand, he starts reconsidering his rebellious streak and what it really says about him and his life.

The film is quite engaging, especially if you're a fan of a quality coming-of-age drama. The socially defiant teen is a cinematic icon that will never fade from film, because quite frankly, teenage rebellion is always blossoming, just in different forms. Dean's version, however, may be a bit too pure for the Miley Cyrus generation. Sure there's some drinking, suggested promiscuity, violence and epic parental conflict, but it's nothing in compared to the spray paint-huffing girls from Thirteen, or even Michael Cera's pyromanical french alter ego  In Youth in Revolt. He's more of a thinkers revolutionary, a Jordan Catalano if you will, spending more time staring at you with his baby blues and leaning against things than actually doing something. And when he does try and act out, it's pretty tame. In the first scene, he crawls into the fetal position and plays with a toy monkey, while over-the-top drunk. Later, he moos during a school trip to the planetarium (he was trying to make a joke about Taurus), causing the "real" badasses of his school to whisper, "Isn't he cute?"

The thing is, Dean is cute, real cute actually, and that's what pulls you in at first. But as the movie and his character develop, you come to see him as more than just the most perfectly unkept movie star. Like when he cuts through another one of his parents' endless arguments, collapsing in his chair and yelling that they are "tearing [him] apart." It seems melodramatic on paper, but you can't help but believe him on-screen because his face matches his words almost perfectly. He's coming apart at the seams right in front of your eyes.

Although Dean's emotions are dead-on, his look is a bit too old for his character. He's supposed to be 17, but he looks like 25. Watching him carry a bagged lunch seems somewhat absurd. If you didn't know the story, you might think he was a teacher, or an older brother, bringing his sister the soggy sandwich she left on the kitchen counter. Especially when you see him stand next to baby-faced Mineo. But none of this is Dean's fault. Teen film directors always seem to cast older actors, hoping for more depth. In most cases, their plan doesn't pan out (see: almost every terribly awesome teen movie or TV show from the 90s). But here, our leading man more than makes up for the age difference. In fact, without him, the movie would likely fall apart.

In truth, Rebel Without a Cause is far from perfect. Like it's protagonist, it's slightly confused. The score is much too loud and dramatic in certain moments, making what could have been a serious moment seem silly. Also, Natalie Wood tries to hard to be edgy and misunderstood. Her eyes bulge out of her head whenever she has a meaningful monologue. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't really understand why she got an Oscar-nom and Dean got nada.

Mineo, on the other hand, is fairly deserving of buzz. Although he's character can be a bit creepy at times (he basically follows Jim around, attempting to regain his lost father figure), you can't help but feel sad for him. The scene where he initiates a family-themed role play with Judy and Jim is devastating thanks to Mineo's overtly overeager eyes and childlike grin. Even a taste of real love is enough to make him look and feel like a kid again.

As you probably know, Dean died in a fatal car accident a year after the movie finished shooting, sadly leaving us with nothing more than a taste of the superb acting he had to offer. If he could do adolescent yearning so right, just imagine what he could have done with quarterlife crisis cinema. Or middle-aged melodrama.  Unlike Efron, and all the other teen idols of today, we'll never get to see him grow up, fade away or crash and burn. He'll always that dreamer in the crimson coat to us, forever waiting for his chance to break out.